Write an essay discussing: ‘Cultural globalization’ plays a significant role in developing global identities.

Click here to order this assignment @Essaywriting.us.No Plagiarism.Written from scratch by professional writers.

Question – Write an essay discussing: ‘Cultural globalization’ plays a significant role in developing global identities.

Marking Criteria:

  • An original approach to the question is present.
  • Sociological terms are diverse & critically engaged.
  • Contemporary issues pertinent to the question are integrated into discussion.
  • Writing style is succinct, accurate, & sophisticated.
  • Structure is logical & all key sections (introduction, body, & conclusion) are well developed.
  • Key references cited accurately & contextualized: APA 6th Edition (minimum 4 references from the reference list and minimum 2 from your own research – no marks will be given if this is not followed)

 

WRITING AN ESSAY: no marks will be given if this is not followed

 

  • Introduction: Background information

Thesis statement: how you intend to answer the essay question.

Outline of essay: list of key points to be raised in body of the essay

 

  • Body: The main section of the essay where the question is answered. This is where your research appears. Consists of discrete sections that revolve around the central ideas which were identified in the introduction. Sections do not necessarily correspond to paragraphs. A general rule is: “One idea per paragraph” and there may be several ideas in one section. Sections/paragraphs must follow a logical path and consist of specific structural elements (e.g. ‘linking sentences’) that guide the reader from one idea to the next.

 

  • Conclusion: Summaries the body’s main ideas.
    State how you have answered the question
    No new information is entered here.

 

 

 

 

Layout: no marks will be given if this is not followed

  • Times New Roman 12 point
  • Name & student number in header
  • Double spacing Left AND right justification

 

 

 

Reference list and Readings: minimum 4 references from the reference list and minimum 2 from your own research – no marks will be given if this is not followed

  • Holmes, D., et al. (2003) Globalisation (Ch. 13 p.421-435) Australian sociology
  • Turner, G. (2004). Understanding Celebrity (Ch1 p. 3-27) in Understanding Celebrity
  • Turkle, S. (1999). Cyberspace and Identity , Contemporary Sociology 28(6), 643-648
  • Ryan, John and Wentworth, William M. (1999) “Classical Sociological Theory and the Mass

Media” (Ch 2 pp. 23-40) Media and Society: The Production of Culture in the Mass Media Needham Heights, MA, Allyn and Bacon

  • Asgary, N., & Walle, A. H. (2002). The cultural impact of globalisation: Economic activity and social change. Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal, 9(3), 58-75.
  • Cleveland, M., Rojas-Méndez, J. I., Laroche, M., & Papadopoulos, N. (2016). Identity, culture, dispositions and behavior: A cross-national examination of globalization and culture change. Journal of Business Research, 69(3), 1090-1102.
  • Macionis J. & Plummer K, (2008) Sociology: A Global Introduction, 4th edition, Pearson Education, Essex, United Kingdom, 128-148
  • Wright Mills, C. (1991) “The Sociological Imagination” (Ch 1 pp. 13-23) The New Modern

Sociology Readings Peter Worsley (ed.). England, Penguin

  • Van Krieken et al (2000) “What is Sociology?” (Ch1 pp. 1-35) Sociology: Themes and

Perspectives (2nd ed.) Frenchs Forest, NSW, Pearson Education Australia

  • Macionis J. & Plummer K, (2012) Sociology: A Global Introduction, 5th edition, Pearson Education, Essex, United Kingdom, 148-165
  • Reisinger, Y. (2013). Cultural tourism. The Rutledge handbook of cultural tourism, Routledge; London, UK, 0-43.
  • Bertoni, M. S. (2010). The U.S. imperial jugger-not: Saturation points and cultural globalization. Integral Review, 6(1), 178-196.

 

Create a C# application that calculate and displays membership fees for N customers

Click here to order this assignment @Essaywriting.us.No Plagiarism.Written from scratch by professional writers.

Task
Create a C# application that calculate and displays membership fees for N customers who
registered for membership from a sport center based in Victoria, Australia. Declared a constant
variable M to be equal to the largest digit of your student id number (e.g. if your student id is
s3025423 then M should be equal to 5). Assume M=4, if the largest digit of your student id
number is less than 4. The standard charges of membership are shown below
Length of Membership Rate (including tax)
1-6 months $30.0 per month
6-12 months $27.5 per month
More than 12 months $25.0 per month
Specific Requirements
 The application should ask the user to enter the customer name, the number of months
for membership, and yes or no to indicate whether the customer receives a special offer
or not. The special offer will give customers a 15% discount of the memship no matter
how many months they register.
 Assume that the number of month to be entered is an integer type with the range
between 1 and 60. An error message should be issued if a user enters a value beyond
this range and the re-entering is required.
 The program makes a calculation of membership and displays the result as shown in the
below figure. The program should be kept running with entering next set of input data.
NIT5150 – Advanced Object Oriented Programming Victoria University
2
 After all M sets of input data are entered from the keyboard, your program will also
display the information that includes the customer spending most, the customer
spending least as well as a simple bar chart to display how many members with the
number of months are less than 6 months and greater than/equal 6 months as shown in
the below figure.
 The application should be user-friendly by displaying appropriate welcome, exit and
error message. Your program should be run as normal without changing any source
code except setting M with a different value.
Submission Requirements
You are required to submit two files:
1. Your application project packed as a single zip file.
2. A user manual document to show how your program works, provide screenshot and test
cases. Assignment Cover Sheet with your name and student ID should be added at the
beginning as a cover page. Document should be submitted in Word format.
NIT5150 – Advanced Object Oriented Programming Victoria University
3
(The document and the project should be submitted separately. Do not zip

LLW5004 Lawyers’ Ethics and Professional Responsibility:

Click here to order this assignment @Essaywriting.us.No Plagiarism.Written from scratch by professional writers.

Victoria Law School
LLW5004 Lawyers’ Ethics and Professional Responsibility: Semester 2 of 2018 CASE STUDY (ASSIGNMENT PART 2)
1. About the Case Study 1.1. The Case Study is worth 20% of the total assessment for this unit. 1.2. The Case Study may be undertaken either individually or collaboratively in groups not exceeding 4 people. Group work, though recommended, is therefore OPTIONAL. 1.3. The Case Study is based on the same Facts as for the Online Quiz (Assignment Part 1) and which have been available on VU Collaborate since Week 1. For convenience, the Facts are reproduced in this document. 1.4. The Case Study is based on lectures, tutorials and content covered in the first 5 weeks of semester as well as legislation, rules and resources made available on and/or linked to VU Collaborate. 1.5. The Case Study comprises 4 questions worth 5 marks each. Each question will indicate the relevant paragraphs of the Facts that should be taken into account when answering the question. 1.6. Please use the Arial or Times New Roman font, pitch 12 or larger, for your work. 1.7. Please paginate your work and add your name and student id(s) as a header for easy identification in case it becomes necessary for your work to be printed out. 1.8. The due date for submission of your work is 11 pm Sunday 2 September 2018. Only an electronic copy is required for submission, i.e. into the drop-box on VU Collaborate. 1.9. Where the Case Study is undertaken collaboratively, only 1 member of the group needs to submit the group work on behalf of the group. When submitting group work, please include a note identifying the group members on the front page and post a similar note in VU Collaborate. 1.10. References to the Uniform Law refer to the Uniform Law contained in Schedule 1 of the Legal Profession Uniform Law Application Act 2014.
2. Assessment Criteria, Extensions and Special Consideration Please refer to the Unit Guide and the Introduction to LLW5004 2018 slides on VU Collaborate.
13 August 2018
2
FACTS
1. Don Trample (Trample) is a legal practitioner and principal solicitor of Trample Law, practising primarily in family law and the law of estates, probate and administration. He also dabbles in simple criminal matters such as infringements and mitigation pleas.
2. Melaniya Knovs (Mel) is Trample’s cousin and they grew up together as their families were close. Mel looks up to Trample and usually defers to his opinion in virtually all matters. Although outwardly he treats her well, privately Trample despises Mel for what he considers to be her servile character.
3. Dian Radham (Dian) is suing Mel for $250,000 in the County Court of Victoria over a commercial dispute, the details of which are not material. Her solicitors have served on Mel a writ and statement of claim.
4. On a Sunday which happens to be the second last day for filing an appearance to the writ, Mel goes to see Trample at his home and tearfully requests him to help her.
5. Trample’ first impulse is to decline Mel’s request and he suggests that she go elsewhere. He informs Mel that he does not have much experience in commercial disputes and offers to recommend her to his friend who is a commercial law specialist.
6. However, Mel beseeches Trample for help. Despite his reservations, and concerned that he may appear indifferent and uncaring to his family and relatives if he does not at least listen to what Mel has to say, Trample reluctantly agrees to interview her to get the facts.
7. Trample spends 2 hours interviewing Mel and forms the view that Mel does not have a viable defence. Without going into detail, he tersely tells Mel that she should settle the plaintiff Dian’s claim to minimise costs.
8. To his utter surprise, Mel responds by refusing to accept his advice to settle. She tells him firmly that she wants to contest and that she wants him to represent her.
9. This is a side of Mel that Trample has never seen before. In view of the following day, Monday being the deadline for filing an appearance, Trample resigns himself to his unhappy fate and grudgingly tells Mel that he would file the necessary papers for her to contest the claim.
10. Mel smiles sweetly at Trample and thanks him. He tells her to go home and to leave things to him to handle. Mel goes home happy.
Question 1: Having regard to the preceding paragraphs, discuss the obligations, if any, incumbent on Trample under the Uniform Law up to this point. (5 marks)

3
11. The following morning Trample prepares a Notice of Appearance on Mel’s behalf and files it in court. He calls her and requests that she come to his office in a week to sign documents.
12. Trample prepares a Defence based on his interview notes and a certificate pursuant to rule 4.09 of the County Court Civil Procedure Rules 2008 for Mel to sign. When she comes in, he gets her to sign it, telling her that it is “a formality”. There is no further discussion about the proceedings and Mel leaves after signing the certificate.
13. Trample files the Defence on Mel’s behalf together with the necessary certificates under rules 4.09 and 4.10 of the County Court Civil Procedure Rules 2008 and serves copies of the documents on Dian’s lawyers.
Question 2: Having regard to paragraphs 1 to 13, discuss the duties, if any, incumbent on Trample under any applicable rules of professional conduct up to this point. (5 marks)
Question 3: Further to Question 2, discuss the obligations, if any, incumbent on Trample under any relevant legislation apart from the Legal Profession Uniform Law Application Act 2014 up to this point. (5 marks)
14. A few days later, Trample prepares a costs agreement and sends it to Mel with a cover letter. The letter states that it is a “no-win, no fee arrangement” and that she should keep it for reference. The costs agreement is reproduced on the following page.
Question 4: Having regard to paragraph 14, discuss the issues, if any, arising from the costs agreement under the Uniform Law. (5 marks) Copy and paste your question here…

Imagine that you work as an IT consultant for an Australian company of your choice

Click here to order this assignment @Essaywriting.us.No Plagiarism.Written from scratch by professional writers.

1
SBM4101 Assignment Details:
40%
In this exercise, you are to imagine that you work as an IT consultant for an Australian
company of your choice. The client needs your help in analysing the best information
system needs for the business solutions and increasing revenue. The report should
include the following:
• Examine the needs of information systems within a company of your choice. You
need to select a product that is information system focused. You need to choose
a company that has a strong profile of employing information systems to support
business strategy. It is essential that information systems used in this company is
paving the way for more competitive advantage. Your report should focus on how
information systems provide solutions and contributions to company success.
• You also need to identify two alternative information systems solutions that are
suitable to the company needs. Discuss the viability of each of the alternative
solutions. You also need to provide pros and cons and a cost-benefit analysis for
each of the two alternatives.
• Your analysis should discuss the choice of in house development and outsourcing
components and which one is best for the company.
• Your analysis should also discuss the benefits of data analysis to the company
revenue/success.
2
SBM4101 Assignment guidelines
The following is a guideline to the project
Titles Contents
Company Profile
• Background and history
• Products or services it is offering
• Overall organisational business strategy
Case needs analysis
• A needs analysis of the case in relation to
information system needs.
Information Technology
IT strategy:
• IT strategy and map to organization business
strategy.
Use of information systems:
• information systems use to support its business
processes and competitive strategies.
• importance of information systems to the
company success and its impact on the company
without it
• Contribute to sales revenue
Use of information systems in company departments:
• Information systems and technologies that the
company use in its departments i.e. marketing,
finance, human resources, manufacturing.
Alternatives
viability and applicability of each of information system
alternatives:
Alternative viability 1
Alternative viability 2
• Pros and Cons for each of the two alternative
information systems for the company. Identify
cost- benefit analysis.
• Recommendations to implement the best
information systems.
3
Systems and technologies in use:
• distinction between in house development and
outsourced components.
• company use of in house development or
outsourcing IS and why.
Data Analysis • What is data analysis
• Benefits of analysing data for the company
• Use of data analysis to increase company
revenues from existing customers.
• Use of data analysis for future plans of
products/services and how information systems
can play its part here.
Specifications of the Report
● Length: 2,000 words, not including title page, abstract, notes, and references.
● Format and layout: Typewritten using a 12-point Times New Roman font and 1”
margins throughout. Include a cover sheet giving the title of the paper, the authors, the
name of the course, and the date submitted, as well as a 150-word abstract summarizing
the contents of the project. All pages except the cover page should be numbered
consecutively with numbers appearing at the bottom of each page.
●Citations and references: All sources should be cited parenthetically in the text and
included in a reference list at the end of the paper according to American Sociological
Association style guidelines provided by the instructor. In APA citation style, all sources
cited parenthetically in the text must appear in the reference list and all sources appearing
in the reference list must be cited parenthetically at least once in the text. Guidelines for
using APA citation style are posted to the “assignments” page of the OLS.
SUBMITTING THE COMPLETED REPORT
● Your completed report must be submitted no later than 11.59 PM on Monday 10,
September 2018. Post your report to OLS as an MS-Word file.

Critique of Research Studies Instructions

Click here to order this assignment @Essaywriting.us.No Plagiarism.Written from scratch by professional writers.

Critique of Research Studies Instructions

Directions:

Complete a critique of the quantitative and qualitative articles that were submitted in Topic 3.

This assignment will be completed in three parts. Refer to the information below as a guide to the information that should be included in each part.

Follow the guidelines for the quantitative and qualitative article critiques in Box 5.2: Guide to an Overall Critique of a Quantitative Research Report, and Box 5.3: Guide to an Overall Critique of a Qualitative Research Report, in Chapter 5 of the Nursing Research: Generating and Assessing Evidence for Nursing Practice textbook.

  1. Utilize a central heading to indicate that what follows is the critique of the articles.
  2. The side headings of the critique for each article should follow the headings in Box 5.2 and Box 5.3 in Chapter 5 of the Nursing Research: Generating and Assessing Evidence for Nursing Practice
  3. Note that within these basic guidelines, there are additional references to Detailed Critiquing Guidelines found in additional boxes in other chapters of the Nursing Research: Generating and Assessing Evidence for Nursing Practice textbook focused on the various elements of a research study report. Use these to expand the research study and to learn specific terminology appropriate to the critique of research.

When turning in the final submission, please put the elements in the following order: Quantitative Article Critique, Qualitative Article Critique, References (which should include the two articles, the text, and any other additional sources).

Critique of Research Studies – Part 1: Due Topic 4

For Part 1 of the critique, focus only on the following segments for each article:

Quantitative Qualitative
·          Title ·          Title
·          Abstract ·          Abstract
·          Introduction ·          Introduction
o    Statement of the problem o    Statement of the problem
o    Hypotheses or research questions o    Research questions
o    Literature review o    Literature review
o    Conceptual/Theoretical framework o    Conceptual underpinnings

 

 

 

Critique of Research Studies – Part 2: Due Topic 6

For Part 2 of the critique, focus only on the following segments for each article:

Quantitative Qualitative
·          Method ·          Method
o    Protection of human rights o    Protection of participants’ rights
o    Research design o    Research design and research tradition
o    Population and sample o    Sample and setting
o    Data collection and measurement o    Data collection
o    Procedures o    Procedures
  o    Enhancement of trustworthiness

 

Critique of Research Studies – Part 3: Due Topic 8

For Part 3 of the critique, focus only on the following segments for each article:

Quantitative Qualitative
·          Results ·          Results
o    Data analysis o    Data analysis
o    Reliability and validity o    Theoretical integrations
·          Discussion ·          Discussion
o    Interpretation of findings o    Interpretation of the findings
o    Implications/Recommendations o    Implications/Recommendations
·          Global Issues ·          Global Issues
o    Presentation o    Presentation
o    Researcher credibility o    Researcher credibility
o    Summary assessment o    Summary assessment
   

 

HI5002: Finance for Business

Click here to order this assignment @Essaywriting.us.No Plagiarism.Written from scratch by professional writers.

HI5002 Finance for Business Group Assignment T2 2018
1
HI5002: Finance for Business
Trimester 2 2018
Group Assignment
Assessment Value: 30%

Due Date: Sunday 23:59 pm, Week 10
Group: 2 – 4 students
Length: Min 3,000 words

INSTRUCTIONS
Students are required to form a group to study, undertake research, analyse and conduct
academic work within the areas of business finance covered in learning materials Topics
1 to 10 inclusive. The assignment should examine the main issues, including underlying
theories, implement performance measures used and explain the corporate financial
performance. Your group is strongly advised to reference professional websites, journal
articles and text books in this assignment (case study).
Tasks
This assessment task is a written report and analysis of the financial performance of two
selected listed companies on the ASX in order to provide financial and investment advice
to a wealthy investor. This assignment requires your group to undertake a comprehensive
examination of corporate financial performance based on update financial statements of
the chosen companies.
Group Arrangement
This assignment must be completed IN Group. Each group can be from 2 to maximum 4
student members. Each group will choose two companies and once the companies has
been chosen, the other group cannot choose the same two companies. First come first
served rule applies here, it means you need to form your group, choose two companies
from the list of ASX and register them with your lecturer as soon as possible. Indicate
your group leader when registering your group with your lecturer for assignment
administration and submission. Once your lecturer registers your chosen companies,
they cannot be chosen by any other group. Your lecturer then will put your group on
Black Board to enable you to interact and discuss on the issues of your group assignment
using Black Board environment. However, face to face meeting, discussion and other
methods of communication are needed to ensure quality of group work. Each group
needs to have your own arrangement so that all the group members will contribute
equally in the group work. If not, a Contribution Statement, which clearly indicated
individual contribution (in terms of percentage) of each member, should be submitted as
a separate item in your assignment. Your individual contribution then will be assessed
based on contribution statement to avoid any free riders.
HI5002 Finance for Business Group Assignment T2 2018
2
Submission
Please make sure that your group member’s name and surname, student ID, subject name,
and code and lecture’s name are written on the cover sheet of the submitted assignment.
When you submit your assignment electronically, please save the file as ‘Group
Assignment- your group name .doc’. You are required to submit the assignment at Group
Assignment Final Submission, which is under Group Assignment and Due Dates on
Black Board.
Submitted work should be your original work showing your creativity. Please ensure the
self-check for plagiarism to be done before final submission in accordance with
SafeAssign Student Guide in Black Board. As a guide, a similarity score of over 30% is
considered as excessive except in the cases where the similarity is caused by the use of
template provided by the lecturer, references or sources of data. Please note that it takes
48 hours for the self-check report to be available for your viewing.
Always keep an electronic copy until you have received the final grade for the Unit. Please
make sure that you submit the correct file. Any appeal relating to submitting wrong
files after the deadline will not be considered.
Deadlines
Registration of groups and chosen companies: 5 pm Friday, Week 4
Final Submission of Group Assignment: Midnight (23:59 pm.) Sunday, Week 10
Late submission incurs penalties of 5 (five) % of the assessment value per calendar day
unless an extension and/or special consideration has been granted by the lecturer prior
to the assessment deadline.
BACKGROUND
You’re a group of investment analysts who work for a large investment consulting firm
based in Australia. There’s one big institutional investor from overseas that is interested
in investing in the Australian market. You’ve been asked to choose two large companies
operating under the same industry in Australia (the industry you think will have the most
promising future for investment) then evaluate and compare them. Finally make a
recommendation through your Report to the investor which one is more superior
fundamentally.
Create your group’s “business name” under which your group will be providing the
financial advisory services. Choose two listed companies that your group will
investigate/analyse for the purposes of possible recommendation to your client. The group
should obtain all information about the selected companies from this web site:
www.asx.com.au.
Required:
Obtain copies of Financial Statements including Income Statements, Balance Sheets,
and Statement of Changes in Equity, Cash Flows Statements and Notes for three (3)
financial year 2014-2015, 2015-2016 and 2016-2017. Your group can download these
documents from the suggested web site using the firm’s code (example, BHP- for BHP
HI5002 Finance for Business Group Assignment T2 2018
3
Billiton Company, etc.). The assignment should cover the contents described in Part 1 to
7 bellows.
STAGES TO BE COMPLETED
1 Description of operation and comparative advantages of the two chosen companies.
2 Calculation and comparison of performance ratios of the two companies

3 Analysis of monthly share prices movements of the two companies within 3 years

4 Identify any significant factors which may have influenced the share price of your chosen
companies during the time frame.

5 Calculation of Beta values and expected Rates of Return using the CAPM of the two
chosen companies

6 Identify and compare dividend policy of the two chosen companies
7

Letter Recommendation
Final Submission of Complete Assignment on Blackboard
(Week 10)
Details of financial analysis tasks:
1. Description of operation and comparative advantages of the two chosen companies:
Prepare a brief description of the chosen companies, outlining the core activities, the
market(s) in which they operate within and any factors in the companies’ history which
you consider help present the pictures of your companies. Identify and compare their
comparative advantages.
2 marks
2. Calculation and comparison of performance ratios: using financial data obtained from
current financial statements of your selected companies for the past 3 years. Annual
reports are accessible via company websites or ASX website. Your client is strongly
interested in the three groups of ratios:
– Liquidity ratios;
– Profitability ratios
– Capital structure (leverage) ratios
You need to provide charts and/or tables for analysis and justification.
6 marks
HI5002 Finance for Business Group Assignment T2 2018
4
3. Analysis of monthly share prices movements: Using the information from the ASX
website, complete the following tasks:
– Prepare graphs for movements in the monthly share price over the last three years for
the companies that you are investigating. Plot them against movements in the All
Ordinaries Index.
2 marks
– Write a report which compares movements in the two selected companies’ share
prices to each other and to the All Ords Index. For instance, how are the prices of the
two selected moving? In the same trend or diverse trends? How closely are they
correlated with the All Ords Index. Above or below? More or less volatile?
2 marks
4. Significant factors which may have influenced the share price: Research via the
internet or financial/business publications:
From research via the internet (using credible sources) or financial/business publications,
identify at least 2 significant announcements which may have influenced the share price
of your selected companies within 3 years. These factors could include merger or
acquisitions, positive or negative earnings forecasts, unusual write-offs or abnormal items,
macroeconomic factors, industry wide factors, significant management changes, changes
in the focus of the companies, impact of competitors or law suits etc.
4 marks
5. Calculation of beta values and expected Rates of Return using the CAPM: Go online
to http://www.reuters.com/finance/stocks/ and type in the code for your companies into
the Search Stocks field and click on the magnifying glass button.
– What is their calculated beta (β) for your companies?
2 mark
– If the risk free rate is 5% and the market risk premium is 6%, use the Capital Asset
Pricing Model (CAPM) to calculate the required rate of return for the companies’
shares.
2 marks
6. Dividend policies:
Discuss what dividend policies appear to be implemented by the companies’ management
boards. Explain any reason related to that particular dividend policies.
4 marks
7. Recommendation letter: Based on your analysis above, write a letter of recommendation
to your client, providing an explanation as why you would like to include one of selected
the companies in his/her investment portfolio. Please refer to the ratio results calculated
earlier and any other trends or factors that you believe to be important.
4 marks
HI5002 Finance for Business Group Assignment T2 2018
5
8. Presentation, structure and academic writing
2 marks
__________________
Total = 30 marks

Academic Writing, Referencing and Plagiarism
Presentation of written work
The report must have an academic written structure including an introduction, body and
conclusion.
▪ Use numbers to structure body of the report (e.g., “2.5. Research via the internet”).
▪ Provide an explanation on each of these issues (points) and explain how they confirm
the underlying theory, particularly related to the ownership, financial measures, riskreturn,
and capital structure and dividend policy.
▪ You are required to use Times New Roman font, size 12 with 1.5 lines spacing.
▪ Please insert page numbers into your assignment and use 3 cm margins.
A high standard of work is always expected, so poorly presented work may be returned
unmarked with a request to re-submit.
Referencing
When writing your assignments, a reference must be included every time you use
someone else’s ideas or information. In-text referencing of ALL sources, whether
academic books, journal articles, newspaper articles, material from the Internet etc., must
be cited in the main text of the assignment itself. Harvard Style referencing is required
for this assignment.
A reference must be included when you:
▪ Paraphrase (express someone else’s idea in your own words).
▪ Quote (express someone else’s idea in their exact words).
▪ Copy (financial statement, reproduce a diagram, graph or table from someone else’s
work).
Example:
Titman, S., Martin, T., Keown, A.J., Martin, J.D, Financial Management: principles and
applications, 7th Edition, Pearson Education, Melbourne, 2016, Australia.
Halili, E, Saleh, A and Zeitun, R (2015), ‘Governance and Long-Term Operating
Performance of Family and Non-Family Firms in Australia’, Studies in Economics
and Finance, vol.32, no.4, pp.398-421.
History of ASX, viewed Nov 07 2017, https://www.marketindex.com.au/history
Plagiarism, collusion and cheating
Holmes Institute regards most seriously any act of dishonesty in assessments such as
plagiarism, collusion, cheating, re-submission of previously marked work in different
units, examination misconduct and theft of other students’ work.
In short:
HI5002 Finance for Business Group Assignment T2 2018
6
‘Plagiarism’ means to take and use another person’s ideas and pass these off as your own
by failing to give appropriate acknowledgement, that is, not indicating by referencing that
the ideas expressed are not your own.
‘Collusion’ (or unauthorised collaboration) means joint effort in preparing material
submitted for assessment, between students or others, except where this has not been
approved by the lecturer in charge of the unit.
‘Cheating’ means to obtain an unfair advantage in an examination or in other written or
practical work required to be submitted or completed by a student for assessment. If the
passing off was done intentionally, you have cheated; if it was unintentional, the offence
you have committed is the academic misdemeanour of failing to reference a source
correctly.
Acts of dishonesty in assessment could result in penalties including failure in the Unit and
possible exclusion from Holmes Institute. If you are unsure about this, please speak to
the subject co-ordinator.
CRITERIA FOR GROUP ASSIGNMENT ASSESSMENT
Content Unsatisfactory
(0-49% marks given)
Limited
Demonstration
(50-60% marks
given)
Proficient
(61-79% marks
given)
Exemplary
(80%-full marks
given)
1 and 4 No specific data and
information provided
to answer the
questions;
No research basis for
analysis;
Merely relying on
secondary data from
internet;
No reference.
Limited data and
information provided
to answer the
questions;
Limited research
conducted;
Limited references;
Adequate data and
information provided
to answer the
questions;
Reasonable research
conducted;
Issues are discussed
based on sufficient
research and in
relation to each other;
Adequate references
in proper referencing
style;
Outstanding data and
information provided
to answer the
questions;
Independent and deep
analysis, based on
wide research;
Issues and factors are
presented and
analyzed in a logical
interconnectedness;
Broad and credible
sources of references
in proper referencing
style.
2 and 5 Calculations are not
demonstrated for the
required financial
ratios
Proving no
explanation of
implications of the
variables;
Providing no
comparison of
financial ratios
Single year analysis.
Calculations are
limitedly
demonstrated;
Financial ratios are
provided
inadequately;
Providing limited
analysis and
comparison of the
ratios;
Inconsistent time
period of analysis.
Adequate
demonstration of
calculations;
Financial ratios are
derived with relevant
implications and
explanation;
Comparison, analysis
and Justification and
assumptions are clear;
Consistent 3 year
analysis.
Calculation and
presentation are
demonstrated clearly;
Financial ratios are
derived, compared and
justified with
exemplary analysis
that based on current
issues and key factors;
Comparison,
Implications and
explanation are
provided convincingly
Consistent 3 year
analysis and properly
HI5002 Finance for Business Group Assignment T2 2018
7
justified for inclusions
or exclusions.
3 and 6 Providing no graphs of
share price and index
price,
No or inadequate
information on
dividend policy and
factors that may affect
share price
No adequate
comparison and
explanation of trends,
dividend policy and
factors affecting share
price
No relevant research
and referencing
Providing graphs of
share price and index
but not in relevant
time frame;
Indicating limited
number of factors
affecting share price
Limited analysis,
comparison and
explanation of price
trends and dividend
policy and factor
affecting share prices;
Limited research
conducted, inadequate
referencing
Providing adequate
graphs of share price
and index, list of
relevant factors that
may affect share price
Indicating clearly
dividend policy
Relevant analysis,
comparison and
justification of price
trend and dividend
policy based on
reliable data within
proper time frame;
Adequate research
conducted with
relevant referencing
Providing well
established graphs of
share price and price
index, which shows
clearly price trends in
the given time frame
Indicating a list of
factors that affect
share price with
reliable data and
proper justification
Analyzing and
comparing price
trends and dividend
policy of the
companies with
exceptional good
justification and data
based analysis
Outstanding research
is conducted with
wide based sources
and proper referencing
7 and 8
Providing no
recommendations or
inadequate
recommendations for
investment decisions;
No relevant
justification using data
and information
derived from the
analysis of financial
statements;
Failing to meet the
requirements of
academic writing in
terms of structure,
presentation, wordings
and referencing
Addressing limited
recommendations;
Demonstrating limited
justification and
analysis of the given
recommendations;
Demonstrating limited
skills of academic
writing in terms of
structure,
presentation, wordings
and referencing
Presenting adequate
recommendations that
properly supported by
justification and
analysis;
Data and information
derived from financial
analysis completed are
properly used to
support the
recommendations
Demonstrating the
ability to present the
ideas in proper
analytical and
contextual level
Presenting a wide
ranges of adequate
recommendations that
exemplarily supported
by justification and
analysis;
Using data and
information derived
from financial analysis
completed in an
efficient, analytical
and logical manner;
Demonstrated a high
level of understanding
and skills of academic
writing by means of
criticism, logical
argument, and
interpretation of data
and information.

You are a marketing consultant and are tasked with conducting a Services marketing strategic

Click here to order this assignment @Essaywriting.us.No Plagiarism.Written from scratch by professional writers.

Subject Code: MKT203
Subject Name: Services Marketing
Assessment Title: Group Presentation
Weighting: 30%
Total Marks: 30
Length 15 minutes plus 5 minutes questions (10-12 slides)
Due Date: Week 10 (PPT to be uploaded on turnitin in PDF format in the same
week of presentation)
Description:
.
You are a marketing consultant and are tasked with conducting a Services marketing strategic
analysis of a service of your choice.
Your group can choose any possible service client of their choice. This must be different than the
organization chosen in assessment-1. Some examples include retail services, professional services,
financial services, Tourism and hospitality services, and health services (Maximum 4 members
depending on class size).
 Select a service business and define the elements of the service using the service hierarchy
(core, facilitating and supplementary)
 Describe your service business using intangibility, perishability, simultaneity and heterogeneity
 Conduct an in-depth investigation and analysis of the organisation’s current service marketing
mix and the 7 Ps of services and provide analysis of existing strategies. Ensure you apply
Services Marketing theory and concepts learnt in class.
Provide appropriate services marketing recommendations for improvement and propose new
service marketing mix strategies
 You must ensure you offer coverage of every P of services and ensure you are conducting your
analysis on a service client and NOT A PRODUCT.
Some important considerations
 No more than 20 minutes with a 10-15-minute presentation and 5-10 min Q & A.
 Visual content of slides & multimedia content is expected
 All group members must present and be involved
 Suggested number of slides max 10-12 to be handed in at time of presentation as well as uploaded on
turnitin on the same week of presentation.
 No shows will receive a zero mark.
 Presentations will only be re-scheduled under extreme circumstances and special consideration cases
must be advised prior to the day of the presentation, otherwise a zero mark will be recorded.
 A minimum of 10 in-text references will be required.
 A reference list at the end of the report and PPT also required.
 Power point slides or wiki references are not considered credible references.
Assessment Information
COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA Copyright Regulations 1969
This material has been reproduced and communicated to you by or on behalf of Kaplan Business School pursuant to Part VB of the Copyright Act 1968 (‘Act’). The material
in this communication may be subject to copyright under the Act. Any further reproduction or communication of this material by you may be the subject of copyright protection
under the Act. Kaplan Business School is a part of Kaplan Inc., a leading global provider of educational services. Kaplan Business School Pty Ltd ABN 86 098 181 947 is a
registered higher education provider CRICOS Provider Code 02426B.
Tips for Working in groups:
Group assessments are a great tool for learning and are used in top universities around the world. Some of the
major benefits of group assessments are as follows:
 Promotes communication skills.
 Promotes and rewards teamwork and collaboration.
 Promotes project management skills and interdependence.
 Emphasizes the need for accountability.
 Becoming work ready.
 For a number of reasons group work may not work well. If this happen within your group, you should
raise this issue with your Lecturer as early as possible so that steps may be taken to resolve the issue or
issues. Please note students may not pass a group assessment if there is insufficient contribution.
COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA Copyright Regulations 1969
This material has been reproduced and communicated to you by or on behalf of Kaplan Business School pursuant to Part VB of the Copyright Act 1968 (‘Act’). The material in this communication may be subject to copyright under the Act. Any further
reproduction or communication of this material by you may be the subject of copyright protection under the Act. Kaplan Business School is a part of Kaplan Inc., a leading global provider of educational services. Kaplan Business School Pty Ltd ABN 86
098 181 947 is a registered higher education provider CRICOS Provider Code 02426B.
Presentation Rubric
Criteria Fail Pass Credit Distinction High Dist’n
CONTENT / RESEARCH
Understanding of the
project
Key points left out. No grasp of issues that
faced the client. Over reliance on notes.
Includes some issues but analysis
glossed over. Team seemed
uncomfortable to go beyond key facts.
Includes all issues, analysis and
recommendations but with little
elaboration. Not integrated with theory or
are not justified.
Builds convincing argument
showing how key issues, analysis
and recommendations are integrated
together.
Builds convincing argument
showing how all key points are
integrated together. Uses examples
to elaborate the key points and
theory.
Introduction /
Conclusion
Introduction missing or underdeveloped.
Audience has no idea what the
presentation will be or was about. No
conclusion. Presentation just finishes.
Limited clarity of purpose / overview.
Highlights key issues but
interpretation of these. Conclusion
weak. Doesn’t tie in with what was
introduced.
Provides purpose for presentation,
highlights and interprets key issues to be
addressed but recommendation but not
integrated.
As for level below plus shows
consistency between marketing
problem identification and final
recommendations well established.
Engaging conclusion clearly sums
up presentation and relates back to
the introduction.
Evidence of analysis No references to any sources.
Suggestions/recommendations just seem
appear.
Steps used in analysis shown but little
justification why or how these are
used to develop recommendations.
Background research and analysis of this is
clearly identifiable. Steps used are shown
and some rationale for the development of
recommendations provided.
Evidence of extensive research and
analysis: journals, prescribed text,
other books, verified websites,
primary research. Used references
to justify analysis
As for level below plus able to use
references to back up claims and
recommendations made.
Recommendations clear come from
the analysis of the project.
Recommendations Recommendations missing Recommendations very general in
nature – client would not be able to
implement them without doing further
analysis.
Recommendations given in a way that they
could be implemented but no justification
given or benefits explained to the client
Recommendations are logical and
feasible. Timelines and
justifications for these provided.
Ties in with the clients brief.
Recommendations can easily be
implemented. Timelines,
responsibilities and costs provided.
STRUCTURE
Organisation No structure to the presentation. Audience
cannot follow sequence. No introduction
or conclusion. Apparent that group is not
working well together. Group members
missing (without valid reason) or not
contributing.
Ideas not focused. Audience may have
difficulty following argument. Main
points difficult to identify. No
transition between key points.
Awkward transition between
speakers. Presentation appears to be
done by individuals rather than group.
Main ideas presented in logical manner.
Flow of presentation may be awkward.
Group members demonstrate that they
have worked on presentation as a whole.
All group members take equal share in
presentation.
Main ideas presented in logical
manner. Flow of presentation
smooth between speakers. Shows
that the group has worked
collaboratively
Ideas clearly organised so audience
can follow easily. The purpose of
the presentation is clear in all
stages. Seamless transition between
speakers.
Question and Answers No questions to audience. No attempt to
involve the client. Cannot answer
questions about the project or
recommendations from the client.
Attempts to involve client but only
with standard or set questions. Avoids
giving clear answers to questions or is
uncomfortable about answering
questions related to the project.
Involves client in question and answer
session but fails to generate discussion on
the issues. Able to answer questions about
the project but is unable to elaborate on
answers.
Encourages and involves client in
discussion. Gets client thinking
about the issues and generates
feedback from the client.
Actively involves client in
presentation. Able to answer
questions with full explanations and
elaboration. Shows full knowledge
of issues facing the client.
DELIVERY
Use of visual aids Presents content with no PowerPoint or
overhead slides.
Group uses graphics but are not
supported by text or presentation.
Text is too dense – too much info on
slide. Differing styles with differing
speakers.
Group uses graphics but often differs from
verbal presentation. Not summarised so
presenters end up reading off board.
Differing styles with differing speakers.
Text clearly summarises the key
points. Graphics and text do not
distract attention from the speaker
or content. Use of visual aids
consistent across entire
presentation.
Graphics and text well integrated
into presentation. Text is
appropriate for the content and
room size. Visual presentation
complements rather than dominates
presentation
Non-verbal & Verbal
delivery
Does not attempt to look at audience at all,
reads notes the entire time. Distracting
gestures (fidgeting) while presenting or
waiting to present Excessive use of filler
words (e.g. um, er, ah, like). Use of
offensive language. Use of slang.
Only focuses attention to one
particular part of the audience does
not scan audience. Voice is low.
Constantly talks to the board not the
audience. Some use of filler words.
Audience members have difficulty
hearing presentation.
Occasionally looks at audience during
presentation Voice is generally clear.
Generally speaks directly to audience.
Some reading off the board. Some group
members difficult to understand because of
rushed speech.
Generally presenter looks at
audience during presentation.
Shows expression consistent with
presentation. Uses gestures to point
out or highlight presentation
materials All voices are clear. Little
use of filler words. Acts in a
professional manner
Constantly looks at audience.
Shows enthusiasm for their own
work and how this will help the
client. All group members use a
clear voice and correct, precise
pronunciation of terms so that all
audience members can hear
presentation. Acts in a very
professional manner.

Validating and Testing Computer Forensics Tools and Evidence

Click here to order this assignment @Essaywriting.us.No Plagiarism.Written from scratch by professional writers.

Unit Code BN309 – T2 2018
Unit Title Computer Forensics
Assessment Type Individual Assignment
Assessment Title Validating and Testing Computer Forensics Tools and Evidence – Part 1
Purpose of the
assessment (with
ULO Mapping)
This assignment assesses the following Unit Learning Outcomes; students
should be able to demonstrate their achievements in them.
a. Systematically collect evidence at private-sector incident scenes.
b. Document evidence and report on computer forensics findings.
c. Implement a number of methodologies for validating and testing
computer forensics tools and evidence.
Weight 15% of the total assessments
Total Marks 50
Word limit 1500 words max
Due Date Friday, 31st Aug, 2018, 11:55 PM. (Week 7)
Submission
Guidelines
• All work must be submitted on Moodle by the due date along with a
completed Assignment Cover Page.
• The assignment must be in MS Word format, 1.5 spacing, 11-pt Calibri
(Body) font and 2 cm margins on all four sides of your page with appropriate
section headings.
• Reference sources must be cited in the text of the report and listed
appropriately at the end in a reference list using IEEE referencing style.
Extension If an extension of time to submit work is required, a Special Consideration
Application must be submitted directly through AMS. You must submit this
application within three working days of the assessment due date. Further
information is available at:
http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policiesprocedures-and-guidelines/specialconsiderationdeferment
Academic
Misconduct
Academic Misconduct is a serious offence. Depending on the seriousness
of the case, penalties can vary from a written warning or zero marks to
exclusion from the course or rescinding the degree. Students should make
themselves familiar with the full policy and procedure available at:
http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policiesprocedures-and-guidelines/Plagiarism-Academic-Misconduct-PolicyProcedure.
For further information, please refer to the Academic Integrity
Section in your Unit Description.
BN309 IT Computer Forensics Page 2 of 4
Prepared by: Mr Ahsan Aziz Moderated by: Dr. Ammar Alazab July, 2018
Assignment Questions:
Objective: The objective of the assignment is to acquire data from a drive, perform data recovery
using different techniques and tools, analysing it and finally performing the validation of acquired
data. In addition, students are required to properly document all steps in form a report, the report
should be formal enough that it can be used in a legal process. Marks will be awarded based on the
sophistication and the difficulties of the techniques explored.
Case Study: You have been assigned a case of embezzlement. A USB is found from the suspect’s
office, and it is expected to have very important information regarding the case. The USB contains
several Excel files, a couple of image files and some text files.
Assignment Specification:
Prepare a report on the following sections related to the case study scenario. You can use your own
USB, create/delete files as mentioned in the scenario and perform forensics. Provide the list of
references using IEEE referencing style at the end of the report.
Section 1: Data Acquisition
Prepare a forensic image (bit stream copy) with the record of data deletion. Explain the method
and tool you used for acquiring data. You will need this image to perform the consecutive tasks.
Please submit this image with your assignment. (200 words)
Section 2: Data Recovery
The suspect has deleted two image files from the USB, recover the files and explain the method (with
screenshots) and tool you used. (200 words)
In addition, recover data from recycle bin, explain the procedure with screenshots. (200 words)
Section 3: Data Analysis
Inspect all files in the USB, use a hex editor and analyse if there is any hidden data in files. Provide
screenshots of your analysis. (200 words)
Section 4: Data Validation
Explain different methods of data validation and use one of them to validate data on USB. (400
words)
BN309 IT Computer Forensics Page 3 of 4
Prepared by: Mr Ahsan Aziz Moderated by: Dr. Ammar Alazab July, 2018
Marking Criteria:
Questions Description Marks
Section 1 Acquiring data using a standard tool
Explanation of acquisitions and screenshots
5
5
Section 2 Data recovery from USB and explanation
Data recovery from recycle bin and explanation
5
5
Section 3 Data analysis of all file in USB using Hex Editor 10
Section 4 Data validation with explanation 10
Presentation Writing quality, Coherence, Report Structure 5
Reference style Follow IEEE reference style (should have both in-text
citation and reference list)
5
Total 50
BN309 IT Computer Forensics Page 4 of 4
Prepared by: Mr Ahsan Aziz Moderated by: Dr. Ammar Alazab July, 2018
Marking Rubric
Sections Excellent Good Fair Poor
Section 1
Contingency
Planning
Appropriate
requirements of the
plan specified
explained and
Issues identified and
listed
Requirements
for the plan
specified and
issues identified
and listed
Not a complete
plan with a few
requirements
and issues
Did not address
sub sections of
the section
Section 2
Security
Tools
Addressed the three
tools explained briefly
as to how they work
and the cost analysis
explained
Addressed the
three tools
however with
minimum
explanation
with cost
analysis
Three tools
selected but not
explained and
not provided a
enough
explanation for
the justification
of cost analysis
Not a complete
list of security
tools and
missing
explanation of
cost analysis
Section 3
Information
Security Act
Explained the act and
the important key
points
Provided an
idea about the
act with the key
points
Did not provide
a clear picture
of the act with
the key points
included
Missing
explanation and
key points
Section 4
Security
Management
Policy
Addressed all the
seven sections of the
policy with necessary
explanation
Addressed all
the sections and
managed to
explain the
requirements of
the policy
Addressed all
sections with
minimum
information
Missing sections
from the policy
(Incomplete)

Assessment Task 1 – Written Assignment – Care Planning:

Click here to order this assignment @Essaywriting.us.No Plagiarism.Written from scratch by professional writers.

Assessment Task 1 – Written Assignment – Care Planning: Individual Discussion

Description: This assessment is designed to measure your ability to identify
and prioritise the most important nursing care issues for a client.
Two theoretical frameworks underpin your assignment: Miller’s
Functional Consequences Theory to identify the influences
impacting on the older person and their level of function and
Levett-Jones’ Clinical Reasoning Cycle as the tool to drive the
process of identifying and assessing, implementing and
evaluating care. Students need to demonstrate how the dignity
of the older person is maintained and how the cultural
background of the older person is considered, throughout the
process of assessment and care provision.
Students are required to review a provided scenario. From this
scenario, use the first four steps of the Levett-Jones Clinical
Reasoning Cycle (i.e., considering the patient; collecting cues
and information, processing information and identifying
problems/issues) to identify three nursing care priorities. A
rationale needs to be provided for each nursing care priority
identified.
From these three priorities, and using the Miller’s Functional
Consequences Theory, identify the most important care priority to
discuss. The discussion needs to focus on the steps of
establishing nursing care goals, taking action, evaluating
outcomes and reflecting on the care process identified..
Due date: Week 5
Friday, 31/08/18 –5.00 pm
Weighting: 40%
Length and/or format: 1750 words
Purpose: The purpose of this assessment is to promote both problem
solving and nursing care provision, related to a selected clinical
scenario.
Learning outcomes
assessed:
2, 3, 7, 8
Assessment one Description and Rubric 201830 Page 2 of 4
How to submit: Submission of assessments is by the Turn-it-in
Assessment One Dropbox in the unit LEO site only.
Assessments may not be submitted by email.
Please be aware of the 24-hour lockout period for Turn- it-in
and ensure you allow enough time for reporting and
resubmission. Please also be aware if all students try to submit
in the final 15 minutes before due time, the system may not
accept your assignment on time and you may receive a late
penalty. Issues with submission in the final hour before due time
will not be considered as extenuating circumstances.
Return of assignment: Marks for the assessment will be published on LEO. Marked
assessments will be available online via drop box.
ASSESSMENT
CRITERIA:
Please see criterion reference rubric on the next page and
consult assessment block in LEO for further information.
Assessment one Description and Rubric 201830 Page 3 of 4
ASSESSMENT TASK ONE – Written Assignment (1750 words)
CARE PLANNING: INDIVIDUAL DISCUSSION
Name: Student Number:
Criteria High Distinction
12.5-15
Distinction
11.5-12
Credit
9.5-11
Pass
7.5-9
Unsatisfactory
<7.5
Score
1. Evidence of use of
relevant concepts of
Miller’s Functional
Consequences
Theory of healthy
ageing.
Sophisticated and
insightful use of the
Functional Consequences
Theory of Healthy Ageing in
developing a nursing care
plan for an older adult in the
community.
Systematic and accurate use
of the Functional Consequences
Theory of Healthy Ageing in
developing a nursing care plan
for an older adult in the
community.
Accurate use of the
Functional Consequences
Theory of Healthy Ageing in
developing a nursing care plan
for an older adult in the
community.
Adequate use of the
Functional Consequences
Theory of Healthy Ageing in
developing a nursing care plan
for an older adult in the
community.
Limited or insufficient use of the
Functional Consequences Theory of
Healthy Ageing in developing a nursing
care plan for an older adult in the
community.
/15
12.5-15 11.5-12 9.5-11 7.5-9 <7.5
2. Demonstration of
understanding and
utilising a clinical
decision making
framework.
Sophisticated and
insightful use of the eight
phases of theLevett- Jones
Clinic al Reasoning
Framework.
Clear and accurate us e of the
eightphases of theLevett- Jones
Clinic al Reasoning Framework.
Well-developed use of the
Levett-Jones Clinical
Reasoning Framework,
Adequate but limited use of
the Levett-Jones Clinical
Reasoning Framework.
There is an attempt to use the LevettJones
Clinical Reasoning Framework;
however, the eight steps are used
inaccurately or inappropriately.
Little or no demonstration of using
the Levett-Jones Clinical Reasoning
Framework.
Inappropriate nursing care is identified
for the chosen care priorities.
/15
–42.5-50 37.5-42 32.5-37 25-32 < 25
3. Demonstrates the
ability to problemsolve
care issues
and provide a
comprehensive plan
for person-centred
nursing taking into
account the client’s
choice, dignity, and
cultural
considerations if
necessary.
Sophisticated and
insightful discussion of the
most relevant and
effective person-centred
care planning, with strong
and consistent evidence of
a systematic approach to
the development of the
chosen nursing care
priority.
Exceptional demonstration
of ethical consideration for
patient’s dignity, choice and
culture.
Thorough and accurate
discussion of the most
relevant and effectivepersoncentred
care planning, with
strong evidence of asystematic
approach to the development of
the chosen nursing care
priority. Sound demonstration
of ethical consideration for
patient’s dignity, choice and
culture.
Accurate discussion of
some relevant and effective
person-centred care
planning, with clear evidence
of a systematic approach to
the development of the
chosen nursing care priority.
Mostly sounddemonstration
of ethical consideration for
patient’s dignity, choice and
culture.
Adequate discussion of
some relevant personcentred
care planning,
evidence of a systematic
approach to the development
of the chosen nursing care
priority.
Adequate demonstration of
ethical consideration for
patient’s dignity, choice and
culture.
Inadequate or inaccurate discussion
of nursing care provision.
Limited demonstration of personcentre
care, with little or no evidence
of a systematic approach to the
development of the chosen nursing
care priority.
.
Limited/little or no demonstration of
ethical consideration for patient’s
dignity, choice and culture.
/50
8.5-10 7.5-8 6.5-7 5.0-6 <5
Assessment one Description and Rubric 201830 Page 4 of 4
4. Presentation,
Structure and Written
Communication
Clear informative
introduction, followed by
body of essay, with a clear,
rational conclusion. All
paragraphs are organised
in a logical manner so that
content flows from one
paragraph to the next.
Exceptional skills in use of
academic language, flawless
spelling and grammar.
Correct word count +/- 10%.
Clear informative introduction,
followed by body of essay, with
a clear, rational conclusion.
Most paragraphs are organised
in a logical manner so that
content flows from one
paragraph to the next.
Highly accomplished skills in
use of academic language, with
minimal spelling or grammatical
errors evident.
Correct word count +/- 10%.
Mostly clear introduction with
some information missing,
followed by the body of essay,
with a rational conclusion, but
content within the body and
within paragraphs is
occasionally illogically
sequenced.
Competent skills in use of
academic language, with few
spelling and grammatical
errors evident.
Correct word count +/- 10%.
Introduction provided but some
information missing, followed
by the body of the essay, with
an attempt at a conclusion, but
content within the body and
within paragraphs is
frequently illogically
sequenced.
Adequate use of academic
language, some spelling and
grammatical errors evident but
meaning is discernible.
Correct word count +/- 10%.
There is no clear introduction, body
and conclusion (i.e. no evidence of
introduction or conclusion paragraph).
There is limited sequencing (i.e. limited
or no distinct paragraphs).
No conclusion or conclusion introduces
new content
Limited or insufficient skills in written
communication. Poor use of academic
language, poor spelling, grammar, and
punctuation. Meaning difficult to
discern.
Word count is either over or under the
word limit of +/- 10%.
/10
8.5-10 7.5-8 6.5-7 5.0-6 <5
5. Literature Sources
and Referencing
Evidence of extensive
reading, and use of the
most current, relevant and
creditable evidence-based
research.
Exceptional and correct
use of APA style for all
citations and references.
Evidence of wide range of
reading, and use of good
current, relevant and
creditable evidence-based
research.
Correct use of APA style for
most citations and references.
Evidence of range of reading,
and use of some current,
relevant and credible
evidence-based research.
Use of largely correct APA
style for some citations and
references.
Evidence of adequate
reading, but use of few
acceptable current, relevant
and credible sources of
evidence-based research.
Adequate use of APA style
with some inaccuracies of
style.
Evidence of a narrow range of reading,
and use of limited current, relevant and
credible evidence-based literature (i.e.
commercial websites).
Significant errors of APA style or
insufficient use of academic referencing
to adequately identify sources.
/10
COMMENTS:
TOTAL: /100
ASSESSOR NAME: DATE:

Identify and prioritise the most important nursing care issues for a client

Click here to order this assignment @Essaywriting.us.No Plagiarism.Written from scratch by professional writers.

This assessment is designed to measure your ability to identify and prioritise the most important nursing care issues for a client. Two theoretical frameworks underpin your assignment: Miller’s Functional Consequences Theory to identify the influences impacting on the older person and their level of function and Levett-Jones’ Clinical Reasoning Cycle as the tool to drive the process of identifying and assessing, implementing and evaluating care. Students need to demonstrate how the dignity of the older person is maintained and how the cultural background of the older person is considered, throughout the process of assessment and care provision. Students are required to review a provided scenario. From this scenario, use the first four steps of the Levett-Jones Clinical Reasoning Cycle (i.e., considering the patient; collecting cues and information, processing information and identifying problems/issues) to identify three nursing care priorities. A rationale needs to be provided for each nursing care priority identified. From these three priorities, and using the Miller’s Functional Consequences Theory, identify the most important care priority to discuss. The discussion needs to focus on the steps of establishing nursing care goals, taking action, evaluating outcomes and reflecting on the care process identified.