Click here to order this assignment @Essaywriting.us.No Plagiarism.Written from scratch by professional writers.
CJ Decision Making Writing Assignment Instructions
Due: Please refer to syllabus
Assignment: From at least three (3) reputable sources –of which 1 (one) credible source must be from the scholarly, peer-reviewed journal article, and 1 (one) source must be from a credible government/professional organization – Students are expected to research information related to one of the following criminal justice decision-making points:
- Plea Bargains;
- Bail; or
- Sentencing: Incarceration
Students are expected to:
- Summarize the rates, of the selected decision-making point, based on socio-economic class or race and ethnicity;
- Summarize steps taken (at a minimum, two existing programs, initiatives, and/or policies) that attempt to remedy disproportionate minority representation;
- Assess the efficacy of the present policies and practices and provide their rationale for deeming them ineffective/effective; and
- Suggest practices/policies that they predict would decrease disproportionate representation of minorities at the research.
Format: The document, submitted to Safe Assign, must be type-written, specifically double-spaced, one-inch margins, and 12- point font. There is NO page minimum; rather students should be concerned with their comprehensive/exhaustive coverage of the topic area.
Students must use APA format for citations and references; students must cite sources in the body of the report (in-text citations) and include a list of sources at the end of the report (reference page).
Submission: Prior to the submission date students are required to use Safe Assignment. The acceptable Safe Assign score will be determined by the individual instructor/professor.
Grading: Students will be graded on the completeness of the assignment as well as the quality and thoroughness of their paper. Failure to follow instructions can result in point deductions.
NOTE: By providing the required items students can achieve a “C’ grade on this assignment. Students wanting to acquire a higher grade will need to appropriately embellish their papers. They can provide notably extra detail on the above information areas (please see the Rubric).
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate to the instructor/professor that students are competent in each of these General Education objectives:
- Local and Global Diversity:
Researching and assessing the topic of either police arrests, the use of plea bargains, or incarceration within diverse population groups.
- Professional and Personal Ethics:
Researching a specified CJS Decision-Making point and evaluating the efficacy of present polices/practices to decrease disproportionate minority representation at targeted decision-making points in the CJS.
- Critical Analysis and Reasoning:
Predicting practices/policies that would decrease disproportionate representation of minorities are targeted decision-making points in the Criminal Justice System.
- Information Literacy:
Identifying and evaluating appropriate resources for research as well as effectively incorporate the information using APA format for in text citations and references
- Written and Oral Communication:
Writing coherently and communicating ideas related to data, practices, and efficacy of one of three present CJS practices.
Furthermore, this assignment will assist students in obtaining the following course objectives:
- (CCO#6) Analyze the structure and role of law enforcement in a diverse society;
- (CCO#8) Describe the factors that influence sentencing;
- (CCO#10) Summarize the historical development of institutional corrections and current issues related to the inmate population, including its relationship to global incarceration rates; and
- (CCO#14) Correlate the discretion that is exerted throughout the criminal justice process with the importance of ethical decision-making at each step.
Audience: The audience of this project is the instructor/professor; assume that he/she is un-informed, an outsider to the field of criminal justice. He/she is also not psychic, students need to make sure the information they present is self-explanatory and would not require additional clarification.
Revisions: As determined by the individual instructor or professor.