Network Project Management – MN601 Assignment Help

Click here to order this assignment @Essaywriting.us.No Plagiarism.Written from scratch by professional writers.

Network Project Management - MN601 Assignment Help

Network Project Management – MN601 Assignment Help

Term, Year T2, 2018
Assessment
Type
Assignment 1, Individual.
Assessment
Title
Individual case study assignment
Purpose of the
assessment
(with ULO
Mapping)
The purpose of this assignment is to build a clear understanding of project
management fundamentals and their application, specifically:
 demonstrate project leadership skills; identify and assess risk in
designing, executing a major project;
 critically reflect on current project management ethics, research, and
theory and practice;
Weight 15%
Total Marks 45
Word limit 800‐1000
Due Date Week 7, Friday, 11.55 PM.
Submission
Guidelines
 A draft of the report must be submitted on Moodle by the day before the
Week‐6 class, to get feedback from the tutor in Week‐6. Updated version of
the report must be submitted on Moodle the day before your Week‐7 class.
 The assignment must be in MS Word format, 1.5 spacing, 11‐pt Calibri
(Body) font and 2 cm margins on all four sides of your page with appropriate
section headings.
 Reference sources must be cited in the text of the report, and listed
appropriately at the end in a reference list using IEEE referencing style.
Extension  If an extension of time to submit work is required, a Special Consideration
Application must be submitted directly on AMS. You must submit this
application three working days prior to the due date of the assignment.
Further information is available at:
http://www.mit.edu.au/about‐mit/institute‐publications/policies‐
procedures‐and‐guidelines/specialconsiderationdeferment
Academic
Misconduct
 Academic Misconduct is a serious offence. Depending on the seriousness of
the case, penalties can vary from a written warning or zero marks to
exclusion from the course or rescinding the degree. Students should make
themselves familiar with the full policy and procedure available at:
http://www.mit.edu.au/about‐mit/institute‐publications/policies‐
procedures‐and‐guidelines/Plagiarism‐Academic‐Misconduct‐Policy‐
Procedure. For further information, please refer to the Academic Integrity
Section in your Unit Description.
MN601 Network Project Management 2018 T2 MN601 Assignment-1 MEL SYD V1.3 2 of 4
Prepared by: A/Prof Nalin Sharda Moderated by: Dr Sharly J Halder July 2018
Purpose of the assessment:
In this assessment task, you are required examine a project case and write a 800‐1000 words
(excluding references) report on the project management and ethical issues.
A case study of a novice project manager
By Patricia E Lindsey, and Scott W Kramer.
Project: University Classroom Building
Location: Southeast United States
Budget: $34 Million
Project Delivery System: Competitive Bid
Party Involved: General Contractor
Case description:
1. Assistant Project Manager Jim Rains was 26 years old, when he newly hired at a large
commercial construction company, and assigned to work on a $34 million dollar university
classroom project in the southeast United States. Upon arriving on the job site, Jim was
introduced to the head superintendent Bob Moore who had been with the firm for 25 years.
Bob was an exceptionally proficient organizer and was often requested by clients for the
supervision of their construction projects. As the project began, things on a whole went
smoothly. In fact, Jim was learning and taking on more project management responsibilities
every day.
2. The winter and spring months brought many days of rain. Often, Bob would have to send
several carpenters home because there was nothing at the construction site for them to do
when it was raining. This did not sit well with the carpenters when they could only work 3
days per week (and were paid for 3 days work) because of rainouts. Other times, Bob would
not send the carpenters home, but would have them sweep up the floors that were already
under roof. This activity would normally take 2 hours with a crew of 4, but Bob would be
forced to pay them for a full 8‐hour day. Some days Bob, being one to hate inefficiency (and
the potential loss of workers not returning to the site after being sent home), sent some of
the carpenters (who would normally be just standing around and sweeping on rainy days) to
his home to work. There the carpenters would work on interior framing, finish carpentry, and
hang drywall in Bob’s new addition. Bob figured that as long as the carpenters were just
hanging around the site with little to do, they might as well earn their pay.
3. The third time Bob sent carpenters to his house on a rainy day; Jim decided to talk with Bob
about the issue of billing the carpenter’s hours to the job site construction cost. Bob was very
noncommittal about the whole issue leaving Jim with the dilemma of confronting one of the
company’s best superintendents. After three more days of watching, several carpenters go to
Bob’s house to work, Jim could no longer tolerate the practice and told Bob that it was
unethical to use company employees for personal work. Bob told Jim that if he did not send
the carpenters home on rainy days they would get paid for basically doing nothing. By sending
the carpenters to his house to use their skills, he was keeping his workers motivated and
satisfied instead of laying them off or having them do small, time‐filling jobs.
MN601 Network Project Management 2018 T2 MN601 Assignment-1 MEL SYD V1.3 3 of 4
Prepared by: A/Prof Nalin Sharda Moderated by: Dr Sharly J Halder July 2018
4. Getting nowhere with the superintendent, Jim had some major decisions to make. Should he
go to the project manager or someone in the home office? What would the company think
about some new employee questioning the practices of a long‐term employee?
5. Because Jim was new to the organization, he decided to talk with Bob one more time and
asked that he discontinue billing employee hours to the construction project if they were in
fact working on Bob’s own house. Bob again refrained from doing anything, only commenting
that the workers would soon be able to work a normal 5‐day workweek because the rainy
season was about to end. Jim still could not let the issue go.
Assignment task
Write a report on the above case study that addresses the following issues; and carry out
research on project management practice and discuss the ethical implications in this case.
In your report, you must use the headings given in Table 1. We encourage you to use at
least 10 key peer reviewed sources for your analysis (a combination of journals, conference
papers, website or any other reliable source to support your analysis).
Table 1: Report headings, their description, and marks for each
Heading Description Marks
1. PM Leadership Discuss, how well are leadership skills demonstrated? Justify
your answer in relation to the incidents in the cases study.
5
2. PM Execution Elaborate on how well is the execution of the project going.
What could be the alternatives to the current processes
being followed?
5
3. PM Risk Analysis Which risk(s) should the project plan have identified, and
what could be their risk mitigation plan(s)?
5
4. Ethics Assessment Document facts about the ethical dilemma(s) arising in this
case, and explore questions such as:
• Does it abide by the law?
• Does it align with the PMI Code of Ethics and
Professional Conduct?
5
5. Ethics Alternatives Consider the choices available to the concerned parties by
documenting the following questions:
 What are the possible alternative choices?
 What are the pros and cons for each possible choice?
5
6. Ethics Analysis Identify the candidate decision and test its validity using the
factors suggested by PMI Ethical Decision‐Making
Framework.
5
7. Ethics Application Apply ethical principles to your candidate decision by asking
questions such as:
 Would the choice result in the greatest good?
 Would the choice be fair and beneficial to all
concerned?
5
8. Ethics Action Make a decision after considering relevant questions, and
justify your choice.
5
9. References List references and give in‐text referencing using IEEE style. 5
TOTAL 45
MN601 Network Project Management 2018 T2 MN601 Assignment-1 MEL SYD V1.3 4 of 4
Prepared by: A/Prof Nalin Sharda Moderated by: Dr Sharly J Halder July 2018
Acknowledgement:
We thank the following source for making the case study available for educational purposes.
Source: https://www.pmi.org/learning/library/ethical‐issues‐case‐study‐overview‐7787
Reference:
Lindsey, P. E. & Kramer, S. W. (2003). Ethical issues in project management: a case study of a
novice project manager. Paper presented at PMI® Global Congress 2003—EMEA, The Hague,
South Holland, The Netherlands. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.
Marking Rubric:
Grade →
Mark →
HD
80‐100%
DI
70‐79%
CR
60‐69%
P
50‐59%
Fail
<50%
For ↓ Excellent Very
Good
Good Satisfactory Unsatisfactory
All
questions
All points
discussed are
pertinent and
covered in depth.
Demonstrated the
ability to think
critically and
make good use of
the source
material.
Points
presented
are
relevant
and
soundly
analysed.
Points
presented
are generally
relevant and
analysed.
Points
presented
are
somewhat
relevance
and briefly
discussed.
Points
presented are
not relevant to
the assignment
topic.